
Case in point, 2009's nomination lineup.

Robert Plant and Allison Krause have 27 nominations this year for "Raising Sand." Don't get me wrong, I loved this album. Who knew? It's as likely a complimentary combination as Chubby Checker and Johnny Paycheck - but it worked. So what's my beef? They already won a Grammy for a song from this album last year. And now, they can win more in 2009? BTW, if you know the technicality that permits them to win two years in a row, please drown yourself in a toilet before you tell anyone because no one cares. Oh yeah, and Paul McCartney is nominated this year for Best Solo Rock Performance - "I Saw Her Standing There" - Go figure.
Best new artist - Jonas Brothers. Are they really "artists?" I love that new "artist" Hannah Montana. Oh well, JB will probably be beat by Lady Antebellum . . . . who will be playing at Hillsboro's Festival of the Bells this year . . . . . . unless they win the Grammy.
Best Pop Album - James Taylor, "Covers." Uh, the songs are covers. Should an album entirely made up of songs someone else made famous first win the Grammy? Rod Stewart thinks its OK. Here's your Grammy.
Rock nominations??? How about Kid Rock, Radiohead, Coldplay and the new Eagles. Rock On!! A Walmart release album has never won a Grammy - think AC/DC cares? Here's your Grammy.
Judas Priest is nominated this year for a song named "Nostradamus" - who could have predicted that one?
Lil' Wayne - 8 nominations. I told you he was the next Stevie Wonder.
Eric Benet. ha. Here's your Grammy.
Metallica was robbed by Jethro Tull when the Heavy Metal category was founded. Maybe they get a mulligan and win this year - nah, Coldplay again. Who knows and who cares. Will I watch? Yeah, but only because the Pro Bowl sucks even more.
"Rod Stewart thinks its OK." That made me smile.
ReplyDelete